Ari Fleischer: “This should be a feeding frenzy.”

Sussmann trial: Washington Post defends Clinton, claims she didn’t trigger Trump-Russia probe

Former Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook testified Friday that Hillary Clinton approved of leaking Trump-Russia allegations to media

The Washington Post was accused of bias on Monday after publishing a piece that claimed there is “no evidence” Hillary Clinton triggered the Russian probe despite her former campaign manager testifying that she approved distributing materials alleging a secret communications channel between the Trump Organization and Russia’s Alfa Bank to the media, despite not being “totally confident” in the legitimacy of the data.

On Friday, ex-Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook testified that his former boss approved the move when grilled during the trial of ex-Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann, who has been charged with making a false statement to the FBI. Mook was called to the stand for testimony by Sussmann’s defense, and during cross-examination he was asked about the campaign’s understanding of the Alfa Bank allegations against Trump and whether they planned to release the data to the media.

Mook said the campaign was not totally confident in the legitimacy of the data but eventually admitted Clinton herself approved “the dissemination” of the information to the media. 



MSNBC, ABC, NBC and CBS are among the mainstream news outlets that have completely ignored the bombshell testimony, but Washington Post nation correspondent Phillip Bump took a different strategy and provided cover for Clinton.  

The Post’s piece headlined, “Again: there’s no evidence Hillary Clinton triggered the Russian probe,” began by criticizing a Wall Street Journal editorial board column that condemned the 2016 Democratic nominee for harming the country by pushing the narrative that Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia. 

“The editorial is titled: ‘Hillary Clinton Did It,’” Bump wrote of the Journal’s piece. “A fiery, furious bit of rhetoric. Also rhetoric that is indefensible given the evidence. It is rhetoric aimed at scratching a long-frustrating itch rather than accurately informing readers.” Continue

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Notice: ob_end_flush(): failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (0) in /home/marchant/public_html/derekhuntershow/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5275